John Kay from the Financial Times wrote a good article on the 21 October 2014. The headline caught the eye was “Mob Justice is a dangerous way to deal with bad business”. The sub -heading read: “Politicians resemble gangsters roaming around extorting money from unpopular individuals”.
This would strike a chord with anyone involved in the gambling industry.

Kay did not mention gambling but cited the following from Prime Minister-in waiting Ed Miliband: 

• A new levy on tobacco groups to fund cancer research 
• New funding for the National Health Service (NHS) from a mansion tax on large homes 
• Youth training to be funded by a tax on bankers’ bonuses 
The incoming Labour Government of 1997 financed its New Deal for the young unemployed with a levy on privatised utility companies.
It is not only Labour. The Tories announced that some of the fines levied on banks for fixing LIBOR will go to armed forces charities.
The gambling industry has to face Point of Consumption Tax and increases in Machine Games Duty. These two measures will reduce William Hill’s profits from £300 million down to £200 million – a tax grab that will take £ 100 million from one company alone.
If a government needs to raise tax revenue, fair enough. But what concerns John Kay at the FT and others is the process. In gambling we are told the new measures are about consumer protection in spite of the fact the evidence shows the UK gambler has never had it so good in terms of value and problem gambling is not on the rise. 
But media hysteria tells a different story, no doubt with Treasury officials egging them on at every opportunity. It all serves a mutual purpose – the newspapers sell more copy by creating a campaigning issue that does not exist and gives governments the opportunity to raise taxes.
By assigning tax increases to good causes you eliminate protest. How can you fight against money going to cancer research, youth employment training and the NHS?
People flock to the UK because we have an independent judicial system that protects individual’s rights and we have a due process based on consultation. All are worthless if the Daily Mail, with a circulation of three million, decides you are today’s target.
John Kay sums it up perfectly:
“There are compelling reasons why advanced societies have abandoned the rule of the vigilante in favour of careful, dispassionate, deliberate processes. Proper judicial proceedings are free of the pressures of 24-hour news. Frontier justice often emerges when the existing law is too slow and cumbersome, and too much in thrall to established interests, to respond to the legitimate anger of the public – and this is a fair characterisation of what has happened in finance. But the right answer is to reform the law, not to act outside it. Something politicians seem reluctant to do because they somehow manage to get it wrong so many times.” 
The danger of the hypothecation of tax revenues to popular items of public expenditure is that necessities will go underfunded.
Thanks to a coalition Government, a recession and rising debt the UK politicians have become anti-business. They have always been anti-gambling.